I’m not exactly sure what you mean by your question.
I’m certainly not very good at art. I can copy line drawings ok but other than that I can’t really draw/paint. I don’t think this is anything to do with me being a scientist (one of the best engineers I know is an amazing artist) – I think it’s just not a subject I’m particularly good at and I’ve never really practiced it.
I do quite like craft activities (although again I’m not very good). A couple of weeks ago I spent a night making cuddly bacteria out of felt with some brownies and guides.
Like Emma, I wasn’t sure what you meant by the question.
I did take Art & Design GCSE (I had to do an arts subject) and to me it was the hardest subject to get a grade A in. I took it as a challenge and really enjoyed it, but I can’t say I’m particularly good at art. I think I was better at drawing objects rather than people. Recently I’ve decided to buy some books on making soft toy animals, but now I just need to find the time to do this.
In recent years, there has been quite a lot of movement towards looking at the parallels and complementarities between art and science, do you think art can support science and vice versa? And are you quite arty?
Comments
Blanka commented on :
I’m sorry, I think you meant if we like art? Apologies. I go to galleries when I’m on holiday, and I would say that I generally prefer traditional sort of paintings over abstract ones, but some sculptures can be good too, especially the modern ones. During a trip to Barcelona, I was absolutely enchanted by the architecture from Gaudi, do you know it? https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=gaudi+images&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=wrw&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&prmd=imvns&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=d9DoT6OfBI2F-waIzsGxAw&ved=0CG0QsAQ&biw=1233&bih=559